EMMANUEL PACIN
v.
NICOLE GRANJA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2024-09-18
No. 3D2023-2295
2024 FL 11357 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2024) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Emmanuel Pacin appealed a trial court order dismissing his amended supplemental petition to modify parental responsibility, timesharing, and child support. The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding the trial court's order was non-final because it permitted Pacin to file an amended pleading rather than entering a final disposition.


Holding

The trial court's order is non-final and non-appealable because it contemplated the filing of an amended pleading rather than a final disposition on the merits. Therefore, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal.


Headnotes

[1] An order dismissing a pleading without prejudice and permitting the filing of an amended pleading is non-final and non-appealable.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Pacin filed an amended supplemental petition on May 1, 2023, seeking modification of a final judgment regarding parental responsibility, timesharing, …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Opinion filed September 18, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-2295 Lower Tribunal No. 19-22194 ________________

Emmanuel Pacin,

Appellant,

vs.

Nicole Granja,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge. Rhonda F. Goodman, P.A., and Rhonda F. Goodman, for appellant. Abramowitz and Associates, and Jordan B. Abramowitz, for appellee. Before EMAS, SCALES, and GOODEN, JJ. SCALES, J.

Appellant Emmanuel Pacin (Father) seeks appellate review of a November 22, 2023 order dismissing Father’s May 1, 2023 amended supplemental petition for modification of a final judgment of parental responsibility, timesharing, and child support (amended supplemental petition).

Appellee Nicole Granja (Mother) moved to dismiss Father’s amended supplemental petition, asserting that Father had failed to allege sufficient facts entitling Father to relief and that Father had “unclean hands” barring Father’s attempt to modify his obligations.

After conducting an October 9, 2023 hearing on Mother’s dismissal motion, the trial court entered the challenged order that dismissed Father’s amended supplemental petition without prejudice to file a second amended supplemental petition within twenty days of the order. While the trial court addressed the bases upon which Mother’s dismissal motion was premised, the record is clear that the trial court contemplated Father filing an amended pleading rather than a new case. The challenged order, therefore, constitutes a non-final, non-appealable order. Obermark v. Obermark, 48.

Fla. L. Weekly D 1891, 2023 WL 6165646, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 22, 2023).

Without expressing any opinion as to whether the trial court erred in entering the challenged order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pacin v. Granja (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
    …sed, the record is clear that the trial court contemplated Father filing an amended pleading rather than a new case. The challenged order, therefore, constitutes a non-final, non-appealable order. Obermark v. Obermark, 48. Fla. L. Weekly D 1891, 2023 WL 6165646, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 22, 2023). 3 Without expressing any opinion as to whether the trial court erred in entering the challenged order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appeal dismissed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw