MALACHITE AT SAPPHIRE LAKES CONDO ASSOCIATION 2, LLC
v.
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's decision may be affirmed under the tipsy coachman doctrine when the correct result is reached even if the stated reasoning is flawed, provided any valid theory or principle of law in the record supports the ruling.
[1] Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, an appellate court may affirm a trial court's judgment reached for incorrect reasoning if any valid theory or principle of law in the r…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, where the trial court 'reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons,' an appellate court can affirm the decision only if 'there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.'”
Court's application of the tipsy coachman doctrine to justify affirmance
Malachite at Sapphire Lakes Condo Association 2, LLC appealed a County Court decision involving the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The ca…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tipsy Coachman Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal from the County Court for Collier County.
Tamara Lynne Nicola, Judge.
October 25, 2024 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Butler v. Yusem, 44 So. 3d 102, 105 (Fla. 2010) (“Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, where the trial court ‘reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons,’ an appellate court can affirm the decision only if ‘there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.’” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 906 (Fla. 2002))); 28 U.S.C.
§ 2410 (outlining exceptions to sovereign immunity in certain proceedings involving property owned, mortgaged, or liened by the United States).
2
TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur. Gregory Bryl, Sunny Isles Beach, for Appellant. Jason D. Silver and Jacqueline C. Guberman, of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Swett v. State, 829 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2002)
- Butler v. Yusem, 44 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 2010)