GPITA, LLC
v.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
GPITA, LLC sought a writ of certiorari to quash a circuit court's affirmance of a Special Magistrate's order finding violations of the Orange County Code. The Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District, denied the petition after finding no error in the circuit court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction.
The court denied the petition for certiorari, finding no error in the circuit court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter.
[1] An appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an order that does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person, and a circuit court does not err in dis…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Finding no error in the circuit court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction, we deny the petition.”
The court's primary basis for denying the certiorari petition was the circuit court's lack of jurisdiction.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGPITA, LLC was found to have violated the Orange County Code by a Special Magistrate, who issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. The c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Finality Of Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
Patricia L. Strowbridge, Judge.
October 25, 2024 PER CURIAM.
GPITA, LLC (“Petitioner”) seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the circuit court’s affirmance of the Special Magistrate’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of
Law and Order” regarding violations of the Orange County Code. Petitioner contends that a writ should be issued because the circuit court failed to observe the essential requirements of the law when it affirmed the Special Magistrate’s order.
Finding no error in the circuit court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction, we deny the petition. Cf. Nelson v. McNeill, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D941 (Fla. 6th DCA
2
May 5, 2023) (“Because judicial labor remains to determine the amount of the monetary sanction against Nelson, we dismiss that portion of the appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.170(b) (limiting appeals to orders that finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person as defined in the Florida Probate Code.”)).
PETITION DENIED.
NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and MIZE, JJ., concur. Rebecca E. Rhoden, Jonathan P. Huels, and Krista M. Runte, of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner. Jeffrey J. Newton, County Attorney, and Georgiana Holmes, Deputy County Attorney, and James Harwood, Assistant County Attorney, of the Orange County Attorney’s Office, Orlando, for Respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gpita, LLC v. Orange Cnty. (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)
-
Shelley's Septic Tank, Inc. v. Orange Cnty. (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Gpita, LLC v. Orange Cnty. (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)