JAMES FLAHERTY
v.
PATRICK FLAHERTY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Summary judgment was properly entered because the nonmoving party failed to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating a genuine issue of fact as to an element necessary for prevailing at trial.
[1] The nonmoving party in a summary judgment motion must come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating a genuine issue of fact as to an element necessary for the nonm…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJames Flaherty appealed a summary judgment decision from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a civil action against Patrick Flaherty and others…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Of Summary Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fision Corp. v. Frueh, 369 So. 3d 1211, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023) (noting that “[o]nly disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment” (quotation omitted)); Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Specifically, it is incumbent upon the nonmoving party to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating that a genuine issue of fact exists as to an element necessary for the non-movant to prevail at trial.”); see also Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 389 So. 3d 705, 713 n.4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (noting appellate court has “no authority to search the record or briefs for new facts and reformulate a party’s argument on their behalf”); Boksa v. Hogan, 389 So. 3d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (dismissing appeal in part for failure to comply with rule 9. 210(b)).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Ross v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 366 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
-
Flaherty v. Flaherty, 389 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)…y, it is incumbent upon the nonmoving party to come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating that a genuine issue of fact exists as to an element necessary for the non-movant to prevail at trial.”); see also Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 389 So. 3d 705, 713 n.4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (noting appellate court has “no authority to search the record or briefs for new facts and reformulate a party’s argument on their behalf”); Boksa v. Hogan, 389 So. 3d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (dismissing appeal in pa…1 / 2
-
Burley v. The Vill. S., Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ross v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 366 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
- Flaherty v. Flaherty, 389 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
- Elitex Program, LLC v. P'rs & Friends Grp., LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)