WALTER HILL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOE S. HOPPER, COMMISSIONER OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

11th Cir. | 1997-04-25
No. 97-6306
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
112 F.3d 1089 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: On April 24, 1997, Appellant Walter Hill filed with this Court a “Motion for Injunction Against Execution Pending Disposition of Petition for Writ of Certiorari.” The motion requests that this Court enjoin the State of Alabama from executing Hill pending the United States Supreme Court’s disposition of his petition for certiorari. The petition for certiorari seeks review of a decision issued by this Court on April 17, 1997. See Hill v. Hopper, 112 F. 3d 1088 (11th Cir.1997). On April 25, 1997, the State of Alabama filed a response to Appellant Hill’s motion. After careful consideration, we hereby deny Appellant Hill’s Motion for Injunction. DENIED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

  • Maiz v. Virani, 253 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …terpretation of the agreements was a fact question properly left to the jury. We agree. This court reviews the district court’s refusal to give a defendant’s requested jury instruction for abuse of discretion. See, e.g., United States v. Chirinos, 112 F. 3d 1089, 1101 (11th Cir.1997) (citing United States v. Morales, 978 F. 2d 650, 652 (11th Cir.1992)). “We apply a deferential standard in reviewing jury instructions.” Jennings v. BIC Corp., 181 F. 3d 1250, 1259 (11th Cir.1999). Although a district court m…
  • United States v. Norbert Schlei, 122 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …erred in its instructions to the jury regarding deliberate ignorance and the definition of securities. We review the district court’s refusal to give a defendant’s requested jury instructions for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Chirinos, 112 F. 3d 1089, 1101 (11th Cir.1997). “The district court has broad discretion in formulating a jury charge as long as the charge as a whole is a correct statement of the law.” United States v. Perez-Tosta, 36 F. 3d 1552, 1564 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied sub no…
  • United States v. Trujillo, 146 F.3d 838 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …e evidence in the light most favorable to the government and drawing all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury’s verdict. See United States v. Lumley, 135 F. 3d 758, 759 (11th Cir.1998) (citing United States v. Chirinos, 112 F. 3d 1089, 1095 (11th Cir.1997)). The relevant question in reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elemen…

Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw