FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY JO VICK, A WIDOW, APPELLEE
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
MARY JO VICK, A WIDOW, APPELLEE
162 So. 2d 314
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant railway company, the defendant below, has appealed from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict in a case arising out of a railroad crossing collision between a train and an automobile. Appellant states and argues three points dealing with admission of evidence, one of which also concerns comments of counsel in argument to the jury. On consideration thereof in the light of the briefs and record we conclude that the case was fully and fairly tried, and no reversible error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Wolfson v. Wolfson, 455 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…y, the trial court did not specify how much of the award represented alimony and how much represented child support. Such specification is preferred if not required. See Zalka v. Zalka, 100 So. 2d 157 (Fla.1958). Appellant relies on Grace v. Grace, 162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964), and argues that the statute authorizing allowance of temporary alimony does not apply when a wife has substantial liquid assets with which to keep herself in reasonable comfort pending final hearing. Here ap-pellee admitted that…
-
Weasel v. Weasel, 421 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…onial portion of the transcript indicates appellant’s cash was less than $15,000 but her monthly expenses were in excess of $33,000. The trial judge appeared to equate bonds with the term “liquid assets,” indicating his reliance upon Grace v. Grace, 162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). As the liquid assets in Grace were bank accounts and not securities, we are hard pressed to see how the trial court determined Grace to be authority for the proposition that securities were liquid assets. While appellant’s appa…
-
Anderson v. Anderson, 577 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…under Florida law, all presumptions necessary to make a marriage valid, including the capacity to contract, attach upon proof of a ceremonial marriage and cohabitation by the parties under the belief that they were lawfully married. Grace v. Grace, 162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). Both parties to this appeal concede that Georgia law recognizes common law marriages. Both parties also concede that Georgia law provides that “[wjhere parties enter into a ceremonial marriage which is not valid because of the…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence