ROBERT VINCENT THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1964-04-14
No. E-335
STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
163 So. 2d 30 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dykes v. State, 162 So.2d 675.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ausburn v. State, 216 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
    …nces? Yes. Aus-burn and Mock shared the dream of something for nothing, the scheme for getting it, the money they got. Now it is time for them to share the guilt and the punishment. Prather v. State, 182 So. 2d 273 (Fla.App.1966); Fountain v. State, 163 So. 2d 30 (Fla.App.1964). Affirmed. LILES, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur.…
  • State v. Pajon, 374 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …e language of a non-fatal nature, such can adequately be cured by the filing of a statement of particulars upon timely motion by the defendant. Martinez v. State, 368 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1978); State v. Bruno, 107 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1958); Fountain v. State, 163 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.140(b), (d)(1), (n), (o). The information in the instant case sufficiently meets these minimal requirements to withstand a motion to dismiss. It follows the language of the statute which [*1072] the defendant is…
  • Baum v. State, 202 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …a.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 495; Garcia v. State, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 709; Lambert v. State, Fla.App.1959, 111 So. 2d 68; Chaudoin v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 569; Dupuy v. State, Fla.App.1962, 141 So. 2d 825; Fountain v. State, Fla.App.1963, 163 So. 2d 30; § 776.011, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw