JOSEPH E. EDGE, SR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Keller v. Keller, 521 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
  …by remarrying. 107 So. 2d at 203.2 The court went on to hold that the Florida decree estopping Astor from using the invalidity of the Mexican divorce was res judicata as to the parties and, thus, was binding on the appellant. In Dawson v. Dawson, 164 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964), the alleged wife brought suit for alimony unconnected with divorce. The husband answered that the parties were not married. The lower court found that the parties were indeed not legally married, but that the husband was estoppe…
• Reese v. Reese, 192 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1966)
  …e victim of a presumed husband’s wrong” Reese v. Reese, Fla.App. 1965, 178 So. 2d 913, 916. The decision on this point of law appears to us to be in direct conflict with that of the District Court, First District, in Dawson v. Dawson, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 536, 539, holding that alimony or support money unconnected with divorce was “not available because at the time suit was filed the parties did not bear the marital relation.” (E.S.) This decision reversing an award of alimony was based squarely on the a…
• Gilvary v. Gilvary, 648 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …ven though marriage was not valid); Kindle v. Kindle, 629 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (putative wife entitled to award of permanent alimony following annulment, where husband did not disclose that he was already married). Contra Dawson v. Dawson, 164 So. 2d 536, 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964) (alimony unconnected with divorce not available because at time suit filed, “parties did not bear the marital relation.”).…