IRENE BEACH, APPELLANT,

v.

J. REX FARRIOR, SR., AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WILLIS HUDSON, DECEASED, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dempsey J. Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1988)
  …eeding just because they are required to utilize the judicial system. Dissolution proceedings are regulated by statute and are unique because the state is considered an interested third party to protect the public welfare. See, e.g., Perez v. Perez, 164 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Harman v. Harman, 128 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). While Florida, as a matter of public policy, has expressly made certain civil proceedings confidential (adoptions, § 63.162, Fla.Stat. (1987); paternity, § 742.031, Fla.Stat. (…
• Carroll v. Vernell Carroll, 322 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …ces [Judd v. Schooley, 158 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1963)] will respond to a test like that employed to resolve domiciliary controversies in other contexts. See Wade v. Wade, 93 Fla. 1004, 113 So. 374 (1927), invoking the Roman doctrine, and Perez v. Perez, 164 So. 2d 561 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1964). In what county were both partners last present with a common intention to remain married and in that place? There the marriage was broken, although recognition of the breach was postponed; there the cause of action for dissolut…
• Vernell Carroll v. Carroll, 341 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1977)
  …ence [Judd v. Schooley, 158 So. 2d 514 (Fla.1963)] will respond to a test like that employed to resolve domiciliary controversies in other contexts. See Wade v. Wade, 93 Fla. 1004, 113 So. 374 (1927), invoking the Roman doctrine, and Perez v. Perez, 164 So. 2d 561 (Fla.App.3rd, 1964). In what county were both partners last present with a common intention to remain married and in that place? There the marriage was broken, although recognition of the breach was postponed; there the cause of action for dissoluti…

Authorities Cited

• In re Est. of Burrell L. Joiner v. Oliver, 156 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1963)