JACK PICKMAN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Wilcox, 351 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …(Fla. 2d DCA 1974). However, it has also been held that probation is a creature of statute, and the courts are therefore limited to the authority afforded by the applicable statute. Pickman v. State, 155 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 164 So. 2d 805 (Fla.1964); Brown v. State, 302 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). We hold that Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1975) providing that a defendant placed on probation for commission of a felony offense be supervised by the Department of Offender Reh…
• Sanchez v. State, 541 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 1989)
  …lt is similar to that behind probation itself, i.e., the hope that a defendant can be rehabilitated. See Holland v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 352 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Pickman v. State, 155 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 164 So. 2d 805 (Fla.1964). Withholding adjudication can be a powerful tool because, by withholding adjudication of guilt, the court can avoid creating a criminal record for someone with good prospects for rehabilitation. Holland. Imposing or withholding adjudicati…
• Buckbee v. State, 378 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …ant was not only entirely aware of that fact, but affirmatively acquiesced in it. See D’Agostino v. State, 334 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So. 2d 1080 (Fla.1977); Pickman v. State, 155 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 164 So. 2d 805 (Fla.1964). Thus, the sequence of events is not properly viewed as one in which an “additional” penalty was imposed subsequent to sentencing, but rather one in which the records of the court were properly corrected nunc pro tunc so as to reflect wha…