UNITED STATES
v.
PHILLIPS
UNITED STATES
PHILLIPS
121 U.S. 254
Supreme Court of the United States (1887)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 30 L. Ed. 914 · 7 S. Ct. 874 · 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2044 · SCDB 1886-211
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.'
-In this case no citation was ever issued, and the defendants in error do not appear. Notice of a writ of error, given in open court at the same term the judgment is rendered, is - not' the equivalent of the citation required by § 999 of the Revised Statutes. In this respect writs of error.differ from appeals taken in open court.
The writ of error is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co., 121 F.2d 561 (8th Cir. 1941)…U.S. 341, 342, 7 S.Ct. 276, 30 L.Ed. 462; King Iron Bridge & Mfg. Co. v. Otoe County, 120 U.S. 225, 227, 7 S.Ct. 552, 30 L.Ed. 623; Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U.S. 586, 590, 9 S.Ct. 173, 32 L.Ed. 543; Menard v. Goggan, 121 U.S. 253, 254, 7 S.Ct. 873, 30 L.Ed. 914; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 2 Cir., 61 F. 2d 115, 121; Dollar S. S. Lines, Inc., v. Merz, 9 Cir., 68 F. 2d 594, 597. Since the amendment cannot be allowed by this Court, it necessarily follows that we cannot direct or instruct the court be…
-
Kellman v. City of St. Louis, 263 U.S. 679 (U.S. 1923)…jurisdiction upon the authority of Bailiff v. Tipping, 2 Cranch, 406; Brown v. Union Bank, 4 How. 465, 466; Hogan v. Ross, 9 How. 602, 603; Insurance Co. v. Mordecai, 21 How. 195, 201; Kitchen v. Randolph, 93 U. S. 86, 87; United States v. Phillips, 121 U. S. 254.…