HARRY KELLMAN
v.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS
HARRY KELLMAN
CITY OF ST. LOUIS
263 U.S. 679
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Bailiff v. Tipping, 2 Cranch, 406; Brown v. Union Bank, 4 How. 465, 466; Hogan v. Ross, 9 How. 602, 603; Insurance Co. v. Mordecai, 21 How. 195, 201; Kitchen v. Randolph, 93 U. S. 86, 87; United States v. Phillips, 121 U. S. 254.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Fort Smith v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 270 U.S. 627 (U.S. 1926)…rn Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 262 U. S. 276, 287; Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Georgia, 262 U. S. 625, 631; Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 263 U. S. 679, 690. [*628] Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.…
Authorities Cited
- The Schooner Sally. United States v. The Schooner Sally, 2 Cranch 406 (U.S. 1805)
- Smith Hogan v. Ross, 9 How. 602 (U.S. 1850)
- Kitchen v. Randolph, 93 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1876)
- The Ins. Co. of the Valley of Va. v. Mordecai, 21 How. 195 (U.S. 1858)
- Brown v. The Union Bank of Fla., 4 How. 465 (U.S. 1846)
- United States v. Phillips, 121 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1887)