IN RE ADOPTION BY BENNY J. TAYLOR AND MAXINE C. TAYLOR, HIS WIFE, PETITIONERS

Citator

Cited By

• Iorio v. State, 297 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …is reviewable on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the cause. State v. Kanter, Fla.App.1973, 273 So. 2d 772; State v. Brooks, Fla.App.1972, 269 So. 2d 23; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 476; cf. United States v. Gaines, 5 Cir. 1974, 489 F. 2d 690. Certified question denied. CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and ANDERSON, ALLEN C., Associate Judge, concur.…
• Moeller v. DOE, 309 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …r Rule 4.6, Florida Appellate Rules, would not necessarily be dispositive of this case. The answer would be determinative of the case only if answered in a particular way. We, therefore, decline to answer the questions. See In Re Taylor, Fla.App.2d, 166 So. 2d 476, and cases therein cited. This ruling is without prejudice to either party to seek common law certiorari or appeal, whichever may be appropriate, after the Circuit Court has exercised its jurisdiction to rule upon the questions upon appropriate plea…
• Grillo v. City Nat'l Bank OF Miami, 354 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …Corporation v. Tunnicliffe, 104 Fla. 683, 140 So. 806 (Fla.1932). The general deposit constitutes a chose in action or right to the money deposited, creating the relationship of debtor-creditor between the bank and depositor. In re Thourez’ Estate, 166 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). A special deposit, on the other hand, is a deposit for safekeeping to be returned intact upon demand, or for some specific purpose not contemplating a credit on general account. McCrory Stores Corporation, supra; 4 Fla.Jur. Bank…

Authorities Cited

• Curtis S. Newcomb and wife v. Edward P. Roarty and wife, 93 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1957)
• State v. Kermit G. Tindell, 82 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1955)