STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KERMIT G. TINDELL, DEFENDANT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,
KERMIT G. TINDELL, DEFENDANT
82 So. 2d 746
Florida Supreme Court (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The court declines to answer the question certified to us under 30 F.S.A. Supreme Court Rule 27 because an answer would involve the jurisdiction of the circuit court and the rule specifically provides that “The certificate shall not be employed in such a way as to affect the jurisdiction of * * * the circuit court * * * »
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Kermit Gaston Tindell, 88 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1956)…l cases not capital which shall arise in said counties respectively.’' The question of the constitutionality of Chapter 30227 was certified to this court, but we declined to answer the question on the showing then made. State v. Tindell, Fla. 1955, 82 So. 2d 746. The Circuit Court held the statute unconstitutional and ordered the proceedings quashed and the cause transferred to the Criminal Court of Record. Chapter 30227 reads as follows: “An Act relating to all counties having a population of four hundr…
-
The First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 257 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)…vest itself of its original jurisdiction which is prescribed and ordained by the Constitution. Nor, by the same token, can this appellate Court preempt that trial jurisdiction. Newcomb v. Roarty, Fla. 1957, 93 So. 2d 373; State v. Tindell, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 746; and City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So. 2d 842. Also, before an appellate Court may properly be called upon to answer a question certified to it by F.A.R. 4.6, there must have been a prior judicial determination by the trial Court of the q…
-
In re Adoption by Benny J. Taylor and Maxine C. Taylor, 166 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)…us under Florida Appellate Rule-4.6, 31 F.S.A. as an examination of the certificate forwarded to us reveals that an answer by us would not be dispositive of this case. See Newcomb v. Roarty, Fla.1957, 93 So. 2d 373; also State v. Tindell, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 746. ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON" and WHITE, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence