ARTHUR LEE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guilty Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule #1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
The appellant originally pleaded not guilty and subsequently, when represented by counsel of his own choosing, changed this plea to guilty. Therefore, he was entitled to no relief. See: Sardinia v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 328; Anderson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 887.
The other two grounds of the petition are not sufficient for a collateral attack under Criminal Procedure Rule #1. See: Milton v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 137; Wooten v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 305; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 224; Jackson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 194, 195.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swindle v. State, 202 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…or. In the proceedings and trial in the court below the defendant was represented by private counsel of his choice. His present challenge of the quality of that representation is not a basis for relief under Rule 1. Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So. 2d 795; Messer v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So. 2d 378. As to the case which was tried, the contentions in the motion relating to matters occurring at trial were stated as conclusions not supported by allegations of fact. Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175…
-
Ford v. State, 210 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…ule is that, where an accused retains his own attorney, he thus waives his right to complain of his counsel’s competence. Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 224; Coyner v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 715; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 167 So. 2d 795. From what we have said, it is apparent that the petition was devoid of substantial grounds on its face, and the trial Judge was thereupon in his rights in summarily disposing of the matter by denying the petition without necessity of a useless hea…
-
Duff v. State, 173 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Williams v. State, (Fla.App.2d, 1965), 167 So. 2d 795; Lee v. State (Fla.App.1st, 1965), 172 So. 2d 621. SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JT-, concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Simpson v. State, 164 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Milton v. Cochran, 147 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 1962)
- Jackson v. State, 166 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Wooten v. State, 163 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Sardinia v. State, 162 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Anderson v. State, 164 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)