THE WICHITA FALLS & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
J. H. PUCKETT
THE WICHITA FALLS & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
J. H. PUCKETT
242 U.S. 619
Supreme Court of the United States (1916)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 668 et seq.; Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U. S. 346, 353; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 97; Kerfoot v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, 218 U. S. 281, 288; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228., U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. B. Stuart, Mr. A. C. Cruce, Mr. M. K. Cruce and Mr. Weldon M. Bailey for the defendant in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Raymond v. Chicago, 243 U.S. 43 (U.S. 1917)…ered, and consequently no cause of action was alleged under the act. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Nash, 242 U. S. 619. It is also certain that if the petition be treated as alleging a cause of action under the common law, the court below was without authority to afford relief, as that result could only be attained under the local law in accordance with the provisi…
-
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Brittain, 93 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1937)…Shanks v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 239 U.S. 556, 36 S.Ct. 188, 60 L.Ed. 436, L.R.A.1916C, 797; Poff v. Washington Terminal Co., 63 App.D.C. 86, 69 F. 2d 572; Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Manning (C.C.A.) 62 F. 2d 293; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Nash, 242 U.S. 619, 620, 37 S.Ct. 239, 61 L.Ed. 531; Kansas City So. R. Co. v. Quin (C.C.A.) 85 F. 2d 485; Castonguay v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 91 Vt. 371, 100 A. 908; Boyer v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 162 Md. 328, 159 A. 909; Gasser v. Central R. Co. of N. J., 112 Pa.Super.…
Authorities Cited
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State OF Tex. (NO. 1), 212 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1909)
- Dower v. Richards, 151 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1894)
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1912)
- Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis, 233 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1914)
- Kerfoot v. Farmers' & Merchs'. Bank, 218 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1910)
- Parker v. McLain, 237 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1915)
- Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1903)