JOHN E. ROLLER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CHARLES CATLETT, TRUSTEE

U.S. | 1917-12-10
No. 163
245 U.S. 632 Supreme Court of the United States (1917) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.

Mr. John E. Boiler pro sé.

Mr. Budolph Bumgardner for defendant in error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson Oil Ref. Co. v. Oklahoma Ex rel. Mitchell, 290 U.S. 158 (U.S. 1933)
    …of the property thus habitually [*163] used and employed.” See, also, Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Lynch, supra; Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, supra; Germania Refining Co. v. Auditor General, 184 Mich., 618; 151 N.W. 605; affirmed 245 U.S. 632; Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright, supra. Applying these principles, no ground appears .for the taxation of all the cars of the appellant in Oklahoma. It is true that the cars went out from and returned to Oklahoma, being loaded and reloaded at the re…
  • Union Tank Car Co. v. McKNIGHT, 84 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1936)
    …ally used and employed.’ See, also, Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Lynch, supra; Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, supra; Germania Refining Co. v. Auditor General, 184 Mich. 618, 151 N.W. 605, affirmed [Germania Refining Co. v. Fuller], 245 U.S. 632, 38 S.Ct. 63, 62 L.Ed. 521; Union Tank Line v. Wright, supra. “Applying these principles, no ground appears for the taxation of all the ears of the appellant in Oklahoma. It is true that the cars went out from and returned to Oklahoma, being loaded…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw