POLICE JURY OF THE PARISH OF ACADIA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CITY OF CROWLEY
POLICE JURY OF THE PARISH OF ACADIA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
CITY OF CROWLEY
245 U.S. 637
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Braxton County Court v. West Virginia, 208 U. S. 192; McCandless v. Pratt, 211 U. S. 437; Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shepard v. United States, 64 F.2d 641 (10th Cir. 1933)…t reviewable unless it was clearly erroneous. New York Evening Post v. Chaloner (C. C. A.) 265 F. 204; District of Columbia v. Armes, 107 U. S. 519, 2 S. Ct. 840, 27 L. Ed. 618; Dutton v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co., 104 S. C. 16, 88 S. E. 263, affirmed 245 U. S. 637, 38 S. Ct. 191, 62 L. Ed. 525. We are not persuaded that error occurred. The ultimate question as to the weight of the evidence was one for the jury. Counsel still insist that the instructions were faulty in not limiting without request the consid…
Authorities Cited
- Stewart v. City of Kan. City, 239 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1915)
- Braxton Cnty. Court v. The State of W. Va. Ex rel. the State Tax Comm'rs, 208 U.S. 192 (U.S. 1908)
- Marshall v. DYE, 231 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1913)
- McCANDLESS v. Pratt, 211 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1908)