ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PAUL D. COLE

U.S. | 1918-01-28
No. 153
245 U.S. 641 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.-

Per Curiam.-

Judgment affirmed with costs and ten per cent, damages upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169; Southern Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Leatherwood, 250 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1919)
    …ot the legal rate. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Mugg, 202 U. S. 242; Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co., 226 U. S. 441; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94; Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. of Texas v. Schnoutz, 245 U. S. 641 (Per curiam). The provision in the original bill of lading limiting to six months the time within which suit may be brought, not being unreasonable (Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 657, 672-673), was valid; and as the origin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw