PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
FRED W. NEWELL ET AL., COMMISSIONERS, ETC.
PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
FRED W. NEWELL ET AL., COMMISSIONERS, ETC.
246 U.S. 649
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; Roller v. Murray, 234 U. S. 738; (2) St. Anthony Falls Water Co. v. Board of Water Commissioners, 168 U. S. 349, 358, 370-371; Joy v. St. Louis, 201 U. S. 322, 342; Weems Steamboat Co. v. People's Co., 214 U. S. 345, 355; (3) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S, 652, 658.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara Weitzman, 426 F.2d 439 (8th Cir. 1970)…dman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L.Ed. 410 (1918) ; Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 649, 38 S.Ct. 332, 62 L.Ed. 920 (1918); and Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504, 38 S.Ct. 579, 62 L.Ed. 1239 (1918). The issue in these World War I cases seems to me to have arisen in a more difficult context because the statute there under consider…
-
Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1918)…Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U. S. 366; Yanyar v. United States, 246 U. S. 649.…
Authorities Cited
- Consol. Tpk. Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U.S. 596 (U.S. 1913)
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1912)
- ST. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. ST. Paul Water Comm'rs, 168 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1897)
- Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis, 233 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1914)
- Weems Steamboat Co. of Baltimore v. People's Steamboat Co., 214 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1909)
- Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U.S. 589 (U.S. 1910)
- First Nat'l Bank v. City Council of Estherville, 215 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1910)
- Roller v. Murray, 234 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1914)