DONALD STEPHENS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
UNITED STATES
DONALD STEPHENS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
UNITED STATES
247 U.S. 504
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U. S. 366; Yanyar v. United States, 246 U. S. 649.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara Weitzman, 426 F.2d 439 (8th Cir. 1970)…v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 649, 38 S.Ct. 332, 62 L.Ed. 920 (1918); and Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504, 38 S.Ct. 579, 62 L.Ed. 1239 (1918). The issue in these World War I cases seems to me to have arisen in a more difficult context because the statute there under consideration restricted the exemption to members of qualifying religious sects and made…
Authorities Cited
- Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1918)
- Puget Sound Traction v. Newell, 246 U.S. 649 (U.S. 1918)
- Martin v. Chicago, 246 U.S. 649 (U.S. 1918)