MARY A. PARMELEE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID PARMELEE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY
MARY A. PARMELEE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID PARMELEE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY
246 U.S. 658
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.
Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D. K. Porter in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. Searle, 228 F.2d 748 (10th Cir. 1955)…effect of one or the other of these two, are Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. ( (1915) 239 U.S. 268 [36 S.Ct. 50, 60 L.Ed. 275]) ; Martin v. Commercial [National] Bank ( (1918) 245 U.S. 513 [38 S.Ct. 176, 62 L.Ed. 441]); and Bunch v. Maloney ( (1918) 246 U.S. 658 [38 S.Ct. 425, 62 L.Ed. 925]). “In 1938 the Bankruptcy Act was amended to obviate the effect of these cases, which were regarded with disfavor by the great majority. But, in so doing, the authors of the amendment went further ihan was necessary, an…1 / 2
-
Schreiber v. Colt, 80 F.2d 511 (10th Cir. 1935)…rts. Martin v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 245 U.S. 513, 38 S.Ct. 176, 62 L.Ed. 441; Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co., 239 U.S. 268, 36 S.Ct. 50, 60 L.Ed. 275; Carey v. Donohue, 240 U.S. 430, 36 S.Ct. 386, 60 L.Ed. 726, L.R.A. 1917A, 295; Bunch v. Maloney, 246 U.S. 658, 38 S.Ct. 425, 62 L.Ed. 925, reversing Bunch v. Maloney (C.C.A.) 233 F. 967; Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Oppenhimer, 276 U.S. 10, 48 S.Ct. 209, 72 L.Ed. 443; Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co. (C.C.A.) 272 F. 590. Reversed with directions to allow app…
-
H. W. Glessner in Bankruptcy of Marvin K. Dunagan v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 353 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1965)…lly to the effect of one or the other of these two, are Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. ((1915) 239 U.S. 268 [36 S.Ct. 50, 60 L.Ed. 275]); Martin v. The Commercial Bank ((1918) 245 U.S. 513 [38 S.Ct. 176, 62 L.Ed. 441]); and Bunch v. Maloney ((1918) 246 U.S. 658 [38 S.Ct. 425, 62 L.Ed. 925]). “In 1938 the Bankruptcy Act was amended to obviate the effect of these cases, which were regarded with disfavor by the great majority.” [1950 U.S.Code Cong.Service, [*992] pp. 1985, 1986; See Bankruptcy Act § 60, sub.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett, 236 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1915)
- Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1911)
- Great N. Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1916)
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Koennecke, 239 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1915)
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1916)