ELESTER S. ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ELESTER S. ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
169 So. 2d 43
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964)
Caution
Cited by 33 cases
Opinion of the Court
Elester S. Roberts appeals an adverse order entered in proceedings instituted under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S. A. ch. 924 Appendix. The motion for post conviction relief did not allege any matters for which such relief could be granted. See and compare Stacey v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 222; Dias v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 158 So.2d 766; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Auflick v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 767; King v. State, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 440.
Affirmed.
SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Osborne v. DELTA Maint. & Welding, Inc., 365 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)…elements of fraud are: 1) a false statement of fact; 2) known by the defendant to be false when made; 3) made for the purpose of inducing plaintiff to act in reliance; 4) relied upon by the plaintiff; and 5) resulting damage. See Beagle v. Bagwell, 169 So. 2d 43 (Fla.1st DCA 1964); W. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts, Sec. 105 (4th ed. 1971). Osborne’s complaint fails to allege that Delta knew that the payroll deductions were not being applied to pay Osborne’s health insurance. Therefore, even if the…
-
Butts v. Dragstrem, 349 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…ns’ State Bank v. Jones, 100 Fla. 1492, 131 So. 369 (1930). . Morris v. Ingraffia, 154 Fla. 432, 18 So. 2d 1 (1944). . Kaminsky v. Wye, 132 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1961). . Farnham v. Blount, 152 Fla. 208, 11 So. 2d 785 (1942); Beagie v. Bagwell, 169 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). . Beagle v. Bagwell, 215 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). . Dale v. Jennings, 90 Fla. 234, 107 So. 175 (1925). . Smith v. Curtis, 19 Fla. 786, 799 (1883).…
-
Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 212 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…wes no duty to disclose facts within his knowledge or to answer inquiries respecting such facts, the law is if he undertakes to do so he must disclose the whole truth. Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction Company, supra; Beagle v. Bagwell, Fla.App.1964, 169 So. 2d 43. From the face of the complaint, it should have been reasonably apparent to defendants that her vast outlay of cash for the many hundreds of additional hours of instruction was not justified by her slow and awkward progress, which she would have bee…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- King v. State, 157 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Savage v. State, 156 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)
- Dias v. State, 158 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Auflick v. State, 158 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Stacey v. State, 165 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)