PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN EX REL. ALEX. J. GROESBECK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ETC.

v.

DETROIT UNITED RAILWAY

U.S. | 1921-10-10

No. 104

257 U.S. 609 Supreme Court of the United States (1921) Positive Treatment

Cited by 5 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

City of Trenton v. State of N.J., 262 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1923)

…s that might be cited serve in general to illustrate the course of decision. Cf. 1 Dillon Municipal Corporations, 5th ed., § 110, p. 183. See decisions per curiam: Chicago v. Dempcy, 250 U. S. 651; Michigan ex rel. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Ry., 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., id. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Ry., id. 618; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg tSt East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., id. 608.…
State of Okla. v. State of Tex. United States, 260 U.S. 606 (U.S. 1923)
City of Winfield v. Court of Indus. Relations, 263 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1923)

…v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw