CITY OF WINFIELD
v.
COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ET AL.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Newark v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 192; Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Childs in Bankr. of J. Menist Co., Inc., 266 U.S. 304 (U.S. 1924)
-
U. S. Shipping Bd. Merch. Fleet Corp. v. Harwood in Bankruptcy, 281 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1930)…eneral laws of the District of Columbia is persuasive, even standing alone, that it was expected to contract and to stand suit in its own person, whatever indemnities might be furnished by the United States.” See United States v. Wood, 290 Fed. 115, 263 U. S. 680, [*527] Petitioner also insists that even though the Fleet Corporation is bound by its contracts, the liability has been undertaken by the United States by §§ 2(b) (1), 2(b) (2) and 2(c) of the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920, 41 Stat. 988, whic…
-
United States v. Kaplan, 74 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1935)…found; for a dictum to that effect, see Walkof v. Fox, 90 Misc. 338, 342, 153 N. Y. S. 27, affirmed 171 App. Div. 908, 155 N. Y. S. 1146. In the counter argument, the defendant relies upon United States v. Wood, 290 F. 109 (C. C. A. 2), affirmed 263 U. S. 680, 44 S. Ct. 134, 68 L. Ed. 503. There the question presented was whether the United States could maintain a suit in equity against a trustee in bankruptcy to enforce against the assets of the estate an alleged claim to priority. It was held that the…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (16 total)
- Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (U.S. 1907)
- City of Trenton v. State of N.J., 262 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1923)
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska OIL & GAS Co., 250 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1919)
- City of Newark v. State of N.J., 262 U.S. 192 (U.S. 1923)
- People of the State of Mich. ex rel. Alex. J. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1921)
- Otto Mueller v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 255 U.S. 562 (U.S. 1921)
- City of Hillsboro v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Or., 255 U.S. 562 (U.S. 1921)
- State of Okla. v. State of Tex., 257 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1921)
- City of Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1921)
- Leopold Sternberger v. Continental Mines, 257 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1921)