JIM DENSON
v.
STATE OF GEORGIA
JIM DENSON
STATE OF GEORGIA
258 U.S. 608
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Winfield v. Court of Indus. Relations, 263 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1923)…Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Newark v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 192; Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service…
-
City of Tulsa v. Okla. Natural Gas Co. (E.D. Okla. 1925)…v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394, 39 S. Ct. 526, 63 L. Ed. 1054; Laramie County v. Albany County, 92 U. S. 307, 25 L. Ed. 552; Hunter v. City of Pittsburg, 207 U. S. 161, 28 S. Ct. 40, 52 L. Ed. 151; City of Sapulpa v. Okl. Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 788. Mr. Justice Butler, in delivering the opinion in City of Trenton v. State of New Jersey, supra, in discussing the distinction between the governmental and proprietary power of municipalities, said: “The basis of the d…
Authorities Cited
- Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton, 252 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1920)