HERBERT RAYMOND BRIDGES, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Thompson v. State, 176 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …evidence available to the prosecutor, apart from the confession was sufficient of itself to cause the appellant- and his counsel reasonable apprehension! [*567] concerning the possibility of the death penalty. See also Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So. 2d 861, which is likewise distinguishable. Appellant’s fourth ground claims incompetence of his counsel. This ground is not available to him because he selected and employed the counsel who represented him. Amaral v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d .549.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Echols v. State, 201 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …thout merit, for the principle is firmly imbedded in the law of this State that a prior confession does not vitiate a plea of guilty made subsequently with the aid and benefit of counsel. Williams v. State, 174 So. 2d 775; Taylor v. State, Fla.App., 169 So. 2d 861. Defendant in his motions, brief, and arguments has dwelled at great length on the circumstances under which he confessed to the robbery charge and to the first felonious possession of firearms charge. We have not overlooked these facets of defenda…
• Turvey v. State, 174 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
  …ight follow conviction after trial.” Finding no error, the judgment appealed is affirmed. CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur. . Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977. . Taylor v. State, (Fla.App.1964) 169 So. 2d 861.…

Authorities Cited

• Anderson v. State, 164 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)