J. A. CAMPBELL
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1923-04-16
No. 366
262 U.S. 728 Supreme Court of the United States (1923) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per - Curiam.

Per - Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • ST. Louis v. United States, 268 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1925)
    …States v. Bostwick, 94 U S. 53, 67; United States v. Martin, 94 U. S. 400; Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States, 262 U. S. 489, 498. Nicholas v. United States, 257 U. S. 71, 76; Norris v. United States, 257 U. S. 77; Stager v. United States, 262 U. S. 728. Compare Arant v. Lane, 249 U. S. 367; Wallace v. United States, 257 U. S. 541, 547.…
  • McCORMICK & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 286 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1932)
    …withstanding the stipulation that his possession was “ permitted by and lawful under the provisions of section 33 of the National Prohibition Act.” U. S. C., Tit. 27, § 50. See, also, North Carolina v. Campbell, 182 N. C. 911; 110 S. E. 86, affirmed 262 U. S. 728; Barnes v. New York, 266 U. S. 581; Colonial Drug & Sales Co. v. Western Products Co., 54 F. (2d) 216. Applying the principle thus repeatedly declared, we are of the opinion that the provisions of the National Prohibition Act relating to the issue…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw