GREAT INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
v.
J. W. GREEN

U.S. | 1924-06-09
No. 738
265 U.S. 576 Supreme Court of the United States (1924) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Modern Woodmen of Am. v. Mixer, 267 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1925)
    …dity of the by-law ought to be determined by the laws of Illinois, the plaintiff is allowed to recover upon a state of facts which the contract expressly stipulates [*551] shall not give her that right. A writ of certiorari was issued by this Court. 265 U. S. 576. - The indivisible unity between the members of a corporation of this kind in respect of the fund from which their rights are to be enforced and the consequence that their rights must be determined by a single iaw, is elaborated in Supreme Council…
  • Allen v. Int'l Alliance of Theatrical, 338 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1964)
    …(Second), Agency § 230. This principle applies to a local union and the parent association of which it is a part. In Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Green, 1923, 210 Ala. 496, 499, 98 So. 569, 572, error dismissed, 1924, 265 U.S. 576, 44 S.Ct. 636, 68 L.Ed. 1187; 74 A.L.R.2d 799, also a case of expulsion and interference with employment, the Supreme Court of Alabama stated the principle as follows: “It is also suggested that the Grand International Brotherhood should not be hel…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw