BRINKLEY

v.

HASSIG ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brinkley v. Hassig, 83 F.2d 351 (10th Cir. 1936)
  …nted, the court citing in support its earlier decision on the Kansas statute in the Meffert Case, supra, and its decision in State of Mo. ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, supra, sustaining similar proceedings under the Missouri statute. Brinkley v. Hassig, 282 U.S. 800, 51 S.Ct. 39, 75 L.Ed. 720. The parties being the same there as here, appellant is not entitled to a re-examination of issues there decided, both on the principle of res judicata2 and because we are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of th…
• Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …xisted, we need not reach the issue of whether Johnson also had a liberty interest cognizable under the fifth amendment’s due process clause. . Our due process holding is consistent with pre-Goldberg Supreme Court authority. See Brinkley v. Hassig, 282 U.S. 800, 51 S.Ct. 39, 75 L.Ed. 720, dismissing appeal from 130 Kan. 874, 289 P. 64 (1930); Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U.S. 40, 42, 46 S.Ct. 384, 385, 70 L.Ed. 818 (1926); Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U.S. 460, 470-71, 32 S.Ct. 734, 736, 56 L.Ed.…

Authorities Cited

• Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1912)
• Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U.S. 40 (U.S. 1926)
• Meffert v. Packer, 195 U.S. 625 (U.S. 1904)