PETTY
v.
GEORGIA
PETTY
GEORGIA
282 U.S. 807
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of .February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237(c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1936)…olo. 193, 196; 240 Pac. 940; In re Nottingham, 84 Colo. 123, 128; 268 Pac. 587. Compare Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U. S. 442; Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U. S. 333; Craig v. Hecht, 263 U. S. 255, 277; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U. S. 442, 445, 446; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807. It is apparent from the record submitted that the state court had jurisdiction to try the appellant for violation of the statute in question and that any federal question properly raised as to the validity of the statute could have been heard and d…
-
Rust v. Pratt, 303 U.S. 621 (U.S. 1938)…Per Curiam: The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.…