RUST
v.
PRATT, SHERIFF, ET AL.; JENNINGS V. SAME; ABBOTT V. SAME; AND TIGERT V. SAME
RUST
PRATT, SHERIFF, ET AL.; JENNINGS V. SAME; ABBOTT V. SAME; AND TIGERT V. SAME
303 U.S. 621
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.
Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 (U.S. 1934)
- Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (U.S. 1937)
- Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (U.S. 1936)
- Twining v. State of N.J., 211 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1908)
- Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1936)
- Petty v. Georgia, 282 U.S. 807 (U.S. 1930)
- Baker v. New Mexico, 282 U.S. 807 (U.S. 1930)