WALL ET AL.
v.
BANKERS LIFE CO.
WALL ET AL.
BANKERS LIFE CO.
282 U.S. 808
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co., 193 U. S. 657; Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn., 207 U. S. 310.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McKissick v. Talbot, 283 U.S. 782 (U.S. 1931)…Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937; Wall v. Bankers Life Co., 282 U. S. 808; Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co., 193 U. S. 657; Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn., 207 U. S. 310.…
Authorities Cited
- Wright v. Minn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 193 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1904)
- Polk v. Mut. Reserve Fund Life Ass'n of N.Y., 207 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1907)