MCKISSICK ET AL.
v.
TALBOT ET AL.

U.S. | 1931-03-02
No. 316
283 U.S. 782 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Negative Treatment
Cited by 64 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937; Wall v. Bankers Life Co., 282 U. S. 808; Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co., 193 U. S. 657; Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn., 207 U. S. 310.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

  • Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1940)
    …t the reservation by a decedent of a life estate in property conveyed inter vivos, did not constitute a sufficient postponement of the remainder to bring it into the grantor’s gross estate. May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238; Burnet v. Northern Trust Co., 283 U. S. 782; Morsman v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 783; McCormick v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 784. The speculative arguments that may be drawn from ad hoc legislation affecting one set of decisions and the want of such legislation to modify another set of decisions dealing wit…
  • Hassett v. Welch, 303 U.S. 303 (U.S. 1938)
    …t. 71, U. S. C. Tit. 26, § 411 (h). Compare Shwab v. Doyle, supra, at p. 536; Lewellyn v. Frick, 268 U. S. 238, 252. May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238, construing § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097. Burnet v. Northern Trust Co., 283 U. S. 782; Morsman v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 783; McCormick v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 784, construing § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1921 and § 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1924. Cong. Rec., 71st Cong., 3rd Sess., Vol. 74, Part 7, p. 7198. Cong. Rec., 71st Cong., 3…
  • Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Est. of Church, 335 U.S. 632 (U.S. 1949)
    …n that the gift was not intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at the donor’s death. Helvering v. St. Louis Union [*655] Tr. Co., 296 U. S. 39, 43; Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., 296 U. S. 85, 88; Burnet v. Northern Trust Co., 283 U. S. 782; Morsman v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 783; McCormick v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 784; May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238. A reserved power of appointment or change is, in a sense, a testamentary power over the corpus. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co., supra, at 345; Port…
    1 / 5

Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw