HARGIS, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL INSPECTION,
v.
BRADFORD

U.S. | 1931-03-02
No. 217
283 U.S. 781 Supreme Court of the United States (1931)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court vacated an interlocutory decree from the District Court for the Western District of Missouri and remanded the case with directions to dismiss it as moot, finding that the underlying dispute no longer presented a live controversy requiring judicial resolution.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Upon consideration of the return of the appellant to the rule issued January 19,1931, to show cause why the interlocutory decree of the specially constituted District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri, entered herein March 15,1930, should not be vacated and the cause remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the case as moot, Messrs. Walter E. Sloat and Stratton Shartel for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

It is now here ordered that the interlocutory decree of the said specially constituted District Court entered in this cause March 15, 1930, be, and the same is hereby, vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the case as moot, without costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Berry v. Davis, 242 U. S. 468, 470; Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Norwegian Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106, 112; United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw