UNITED DRUG CO.

v.

WASHBURN, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE

Citator

Cited By

• S.C. Power Co. v. S.C. Tax Comm'n, 286 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1932)
  …ing interlocutory injunctions are affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co., 284 U. S. 598.…
• Meiselman v. Paramount Film Distrib. Corp., 180 F.2d 94 (4th Cir. 1950)
• Munoz v. Porto RICO Ry. Light & Power Co., 83 F.2d 262 (1st Cir. 1936)
  …d. 1468; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission et al., 286 U.S. 525, 52 S.Ct. 494, 76 L.Ed. 1268; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission, 286 U.S. 525, 52 S.Ct. 495, 76 L.Ed. 1268; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U.S. 593, 52 S.Ct. 202, 76 L.Ed. 511. We are not satisfied that there was any abuse of judicial discretion by the District Judge in granting the temporary injunction upon the giving of a bond to make restitution to its customers in case the order of the Com…

Authorities Cited

• Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1929)
• Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Thompson, 281 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1930)
• United Fuel Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of W. Va., 278 U.S. 322 (U.S. 1929)