SOUTH CAROLINA POWER CO.
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION ET AL.; BROAD RIVER POWER CO. V. QUERY ET AL.; AND LEXINGTON WATER POWER CO. V. SAME
SOUTH CAROLINA POWER CO.
SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION ET AL.; BROAD RIVER POWER CO. V. QUERY ET AL.; AND LEXINGTON WATER POWER CO. V. SAME
286 U.S. 525
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The orders denying interlocutory injunctions are affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co., 284 U. S. 598.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Miami Laundry Co. v. Fla. Dry Cleaning & Laundry Bd., 134 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1938)…are content to rest their case on the asserted invalidity of the Act. The laundry and dry cleaning business has frequently been held subject to regulation under the police power of the State. Newman v. Atlanta Laundries, 174 Ga. 99, 162 S. E. 497; 286 U. S. 525, 52 Sup. Ct. 495, 76 L. Ed. 1269; Ex Parte Boyce, 27 Nev. 299, 75 Pac. 1; In re Wong Wing, 167 Cal. 109, 138 Pac. 695; United States v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, 6 Fed. Supp. 725; Oklahoma Operating Company v. Love, 252 U. S. 331, 40 Sup. Ct. 338, 6…
-
Broad River Power Co. v. Query, 288 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1933)…ing a tax on the production and sale of electric power. The District Court of three judges (28 U. S. C. 380) sustained the tax and the cases come here on appeal from final decrees dismissing the bills of complaint for want of equity. 52 F. (2d) 515; 286 U. S. 525; 60 F. (2d) 528. The contention, pressed below, that the statute is repugnant to the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution is not presented here. The grounds of attack are (1) that the statute is a denial of the' equal protection of the laws,…
-
Appling Cnty. v. Mun. Elec. Auth. OF Ga., 621 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir. 1980)…5); Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 215 F. 2d 542 (4th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 915, 75 S.Ct. 295, 99 L.Ed. 717 (1955); South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 52 F. 2d 515 (E.D. S.C. 1931), aff’d, 286 U.S. 525, 52 S.Ct. 494, 76 L.Ed. 1268 (1932). The Fifth Circuit has recently held that: “ . . .a complaint which alleges the existence of a federal question establishes jurisdiction, so that a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is appropriate only when the…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1929)
- Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Thompson, 281 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1930)
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of W. Va., 278 U.S. 322 (U.S. 1929)
- United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U.S. 593 (U.S. 1932)
- Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co., 284 U.S. 598 (U.S. 1932)