MILTON J. HARRIS, APPELLANT,

v.

JERRY A. HILDERBRANDT, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Little v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 234 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
  …which the jury may reject or accord such probative value as it desires, 53 Am.Jur., Trial, § 186, and it is descriptive of the factual conclusion that [*134] a jury may draw from sufficient circumstantial evidence. Busbee v. Quarrier, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 17. Furthermore, an inference may be founded upon an inference when no contrary reasonable inference may be indulged. Fideli v. Colson, Fla.App.1964, 165 So. 2d 794. In Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn, Fla.App.1959, 108 So. 2d 638, our sister c…
• Keys v. State, 606 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …ged, the base inference may be elevated to the dignity of an established fact for the purpose of drawing further inferences. Franklin v. Dade County, 230 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1970). See also Busbee v. Quarrier, 172 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 177 So. 2d 474 (Fla.1965) (“It is well established in this jurisdiction that when circumstantial evidence is relied on in a civil case, the particular inference relied on to establish the fact must outweigh all contrary…
• Mansell v. Eidge, 179 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …nt inferences in the trial court, but at this stage of the proceedings the jury verdict is entitled to all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence and the presumption is in favor of its correctness. See: Busbee v. Quarrier, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 17; Goodis v. Finkelstein, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 400. Prior to the case being submitted to the jury, the trial judge instructed them that they must return a verdict in favor of Frank D. Eidge in the following language: ** “I have determined as a m…

Authorities Cited

• Mangus v. Art Present, 135 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1961)