C. M. PATTEN & CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1933-05-08
No. 691
289 U.S. 705 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536; U.S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U.S. 106, 112; Railroad Commission of Texas v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Carmack, 329 U.S. 230 (U.S. 1946)
    …xpress grant of superiority over conflicting public uses reflects an absence of such superiority. See United States v. Jotham Bixby Co., 55 F. 2d 317, 319, affirmed sub nom., C. M. Patten & Co. v. United States, 61 F. 2d 970, decree vacated as moot, 289 U. S. 705; In re Condemnations for Improvement of Rouge River, 266 F. 105; United States v. City of Tiffin, 190 F. 279, 281. “Arbitrary” is defined by Funk & Wagnalls New Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1944), as “1. . . .; without adequate dete…
  • Bracken v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 299 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1936)
    …o the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535, 536; C. M. Patten & Co. v. United States, 289 U. S. 705; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585.…
  • Bender v. Donoghue, 70 F.2d 723 (5th Cir. 1934)
    …ion of the appellant in bringing the contract to an end, it is right that he should pay the costs. The! order appealed from is reversed because moot, with directions to vacate it and to dismiss appellant’s intervention. C. M. Patten & Co. v. U. S., 289 U. S. 705, 53 S. Ct. 687, 77 L. Ed. 1462; Danciger Oil & Ref. Co. v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 209, 78 L. Ed. -; Railroad Comm. v. MacMillan, 287 U. S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223, 77 L. Ed. 505; Norwegian, etc., Co. v. U. S. Tariff Comm., 274 U. S. 112, 47 S. C…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw