BRACKEN ET AL.
v.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMM'N

U.S. | 1936-10-12
No. 130
299 U.S. 504 Supreme Court of the United States (1936) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535, 536; C. M. Patten & Co. v. United States, 289 U. S. 705; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)
    …outy, 289 U. S. 704; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585; Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599; O’Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co., 292 U. S. 609; Hammond Clock Co. v. Schiff, 293 U. S. 529; Bracken v. S. E. C., 299 U. S. 504; Leader v. Apex Hosiery Co., 302 U. S. 656; Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 302 U. S. 658; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526; S. E. C. v. Long Island Lighting Co., 325 U. S. 833;…
  • Edwards v. United States, 312 U.S. 473 (U.S. 1941)
    …31. Cf. Nardone v. United States, 308, U. S. 338, 341; Martin v. Texas, 200 U. S. 316, 319; Mamaux v. United States, 264 F. 816, 819. Supra, note 7. Cf. In re Securities & Exchange Commission, 14 F. Supp. 417, 418; 84 F. 2d 316; reversed as moot, 299 U. S. 504. People ex rel. Lemon v. Supreme Court, 245 N. Y. 24; 156 N. E. 84; cf. Rex v. Holland, 4 T. R. (Durnford & East) 691. Cf. R. S. § 882, as amended, 48 Stat. 1109. Cf. Walker v. Johnston, 312 U. S. 275. McKelvey v. United States, 260 U. S. 353, 3…
  • Woolley v. United States, 97 F.2d 258 (9th Cir. 1938)
    …ations authorized by the act are not synonymous with hearings. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Torr, D.C., 15 F.Supp. 144; In re Securities and Exchange Commission, 2 Cir., 84 F. 2d 316, reversed in Bracken v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 299 U.S. 504, 57 S.Ct. 18, 81 L.Ed. 374, on the ground that the cause had become moot. The rule in question is not unreasonable and would seem to be clearly authorized by the act. Se [*263] curities and Exchange Commission v. Torr, supra. The evidence was ample…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw