LARABEE FLOUR MILLS CO.
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUBLIN; AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG ET AL. V. MIAMI
LARABEE FLOUR MILLS CO.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUBLIN; AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG ET AL. V. MIAMI
290 U.S. 594
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
[*594] Per Curiam:
The certificates are dismissed. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215 U.S. 216, 221; Waterville v. Van Slyke, 116 U.S. 699, 703-704; Jewell v. Knight, 123 U.S. 426, 432, 433, 434; Chicago B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Williams, 205 U.S. 444, 451, 454; Hallowell v. United States, 209 U.S. 101, 106, 107; United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55, 66; Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U.S. 173, 174, 175.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 645 (U.S. 1936)…dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215. U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638; Smith, Collector v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., ante, p. 641. Solicitor General Reed for the United States in support of the motion. Messrs. Charles P. Taft and Robert A. Taft for Dixie Terminal Co.…
-
Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., 298 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1936)…dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215 U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638.…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1914)
- Jewell v. Knight, 123 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1887)
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 215 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1909)
- Chicago v. Williams, 205 U.S. 444 (U.S. 1907)
- Hallowell v. United States, 209 U.S. 101 (U.S. 1908)
- Waterville v. Van Slyke, 116 U.S. 699 (U.S. 1886)
- Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1924)