DIXIE TERMINAL CO.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1936-06-01
No. 967
298 U.S. 645 Supreme Court of the United States (1936) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the certificate is granted and the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215. U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638; Smith, Collector v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., ante, p. 641. Solicitor General Reed for the United States in support of the motion. Messrs. Charles P. Taft and Robert A. Taft for Dixie Terminal Co.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams, 302 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1937)
    …icate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216, 221; Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U. S. 173; Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., 298 U. S. 641; Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 645. Reported below: 15 F. Supp. 938.…
  • Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 110 F.2d 310 (6th Cir. 1940)
    …130 Ohio St. 591, 200 N.E. 756, and in the application-for rehearing thereorf, but were rejected by the Ohio Supreme Court. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed without opinion for want of a substantial Federal question, 298 U.S. 645, 56 S.Ct. 959, 80 L.Ed. 1376. We consider, finally, the necessity or propriety of remanding the cause to the District Court so that it- may pass upon the sufficiency of the appellant’s petition in view of the altered interpretation of the Ohio Cour…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw