EX PARTE BOYCE

Citator

Cited By

• Callendar v. State, 181 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1966)
  …v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532, 37 S.Ct. 188, 61 L.Ed. 476 (1916); Central Union Tel. Co. v. City of Edwardsville, 269 U.S. 190, 46 S.Ct. 90, 70 L.Ed. 229 (1925); McMaster v. Gould, 276 U.S. 284, 48 S.Ct. 299, 72 L.Ed. 574 (1927); Archerd v. State of Oregon, 290 U.S. 604, 54 S.Ct. [*533] 372, 78 L.Ed. 530 (1933); and Wolfe v. State of North Carolina, 364 U.S. 177, 80 S.Ct. 1482, 4 L.Ed.2d 1650 (1960), to name but a few. A classic statement of this view is the following contained in John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. at page…
• Skipper v. Florida, 293 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1934)
  …dismissed for the want of a properly presented. federal question. Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357, 358; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604.…
• Wade v. Jacksonville, 293 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1934)
  …for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317).…