WADE ET AL.
v.
JACKSONVILLE
WADE ET AL.
JACKSONVILLE
293 U.S. 518
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1927)
- Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312 (U.S. 1926)
- Castillo v. McCONNICO, 168 U.S. 674 (U.S. 1898)
- Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1899)
- Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210 (U.S. 1866)
- Crowe v. Harmon, 204 U.S. 241 (U.S. 1907)
- Chicago v. McGUIRE, 196 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1905)
- Ex parte Boyce, 290 U.S. 604 (U.S. 1933)