MISSISSIPPI CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
v.
SMITH

U.S. | 1935-05-13
No. 899
295 U.S. 718 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a final judgment. Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18; California National Bank v. Stateler, 171 U. S. 447, 449; Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255-256; Western Public Service Co. v. Mitchell, 289 U. S. 709.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 334 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1948)
    …tied up — for example, where liability has been determined and all that needs to be adjudicated is the amount of damages. Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18; Martinez v. International Banking Corp., 220 U. S. 214, 223; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Smith, 295 U. S. 718. On the other hand, if nothing more than a ministerial act remains to be done, such as the entry of a judgment upon a mandate, the decree is regarded as concluding the case and is immediately reviewable. Board of Commissioners v. Lucas, 93 U. S. 108…
  • Edgar Bros. Co. v. State Revenue Comm'n, 303 U.S. 626 (U.S. 1938)
    …appeal is dismissed for the want of a final judgment. California National Bank v. Stateler, 171 U. S. 447, 449; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130, 131; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Smith, 295 U. S. 718.…
  • Eureka Prods., Inc. v. Lehman, 302 U.S. 634 (U.S. 1937)
    …on of the appellees to affirm is granted and the order denying an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. (1) Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Accounting Co. v. Dorman, 295 U. S. 718. (2) Mutual Film Corp. v. Ohio Industrial Comm’n, 236 U. S. 230, 240, 241; Mutual Film Corp. v. Kansas, 236 U. S. 248, 258.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw