EUREKA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
v.
LEHMAN, GOVERNOR, ET AL.
EUREKA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
LEHMAN, GOVERNOR, ET AL.
302 U.S. 634
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to affirm is granted and the order denying an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. (1) Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Accounting Co. v. Dorman, 295 U. S. 718. (2) Mutual Film Corp. v. Ohio Industrial Comm’n, 236 U. S. 230, 240, 241; Mutual Film Corp. v. Kansas, 236 U. S. 248, 258.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Alexander, 306 U.S. 615 (U.S. 1939)…denying an interlocutory injunction affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; Eureka Productions, Inc. v. Lehman, 302 U. S. 634.…
Authorities Cited
- Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1929)
- Mut. Film Corp. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (U.S. 1915)
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of W. Va., 278 U.S. 322 (U.S. 1929)
- Mut. Film Corp. of Mo. v. Hodges, 236 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1915)
- Miss. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Smith, 295 U.S. 718 (U.S. 1935)