LANSING DROP FORGE CO.
v.
AMERICAN STATE SAVINGS BANK

U.S. | 1936-03-02
No. 762
297 U.S. 697 Supreme Court of the United States (1936) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Michigan.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207, 210, 211; Petrie v. Nampa Irrigation District, 248 U. S. 154, 157; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 163, 164.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Honeyman v. Hanan, 302 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1937)
    …89, 393; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 569; Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30, 37; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369; Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U. S. 326, 332; Lansing Drop Forge Co. v. American State Bank, 297 U. S. 697; Chisholm v. Gilmer, 299 U. S. 99, 102. The appeal is Dismissed.…
  • Foley v. Wachs, 298 U.S. 637 (U.S. 1936)
    …ed. The decree granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; Longer v. Grandin Farmers Coöperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522; Grosjean v. Texas Co., 297 U. S. 697.…
  • N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Alexander, 300 U.S. 637 (U.S. 1937)
    …e reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation [*638] Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 163, 164; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207, 210, 211; Lansing Drop Forge Co. v. American State Savings Bank, 297 U. S. 697. See New York Life Insurance Co. v. Blaylock, 144 Miss. 541. Messrs. William H. Watkins, P. H. Eager, Jr., and Louis H. Cooke for appellants. Mr. W. E. Morse for appellees.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw