FOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRONX, ET AL.
v.
WACHS
FOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRONX, ET AL.
WACHS
298 U.S. 637
Supreme Court of the United States (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion' for leave to file jurisdictional statement is granted. The decree granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; Longer v. Grandin Farmers Coöperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522; Grosjean v. Texas Co., 297 U. S. 697.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75 (U.S. 1964)…); Genovese v. United States, decided with Evola v. United States, 375 U. S. 32 (order extending time for filing entered 16 days after denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc, 49 days after entry of original judgment). In Craig v. United States, 298 U. S. 637, this Court dismissed an application for a writ of certiorari as premature, “without prejudice to a renewal of the application within thirty days after action by the Circuit Court of Appeals on the petition for rehearing.” This summary disposition p…
-
United States v. Nat'l City Lines, Inc., 186 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1951)…nly be shown that, with knowledge of the existence of the conspiracy, he knowingly performed an act designed to promote or aid in the attainment of the object of that known conspiracy. Craig v. U. S., 9 Cir., 81 F. 2d 816, 822, certiorari dismissed 298 U.S. 637, 56 S.Ct. 670, 80 L.Ed. 1371, cer-tiorari denied 298 U.S. 690, 56 S.Ct. 959, 80 L.Ed. 1408; Johnson v. U. S., 9 Cir., 62 F. 2d 32, 34-35; Marcante v. U. S., 10 Cir., 49 F. 2d 156, 157. Exclusion of Testimony. Defendants assert error upon the par…
-
Craig v. United States, 89 F.2d 980 (9th Cir. 1937)…preme Court dismissed an application by the appellant for a writ of certiorari, on the ground that it was premature, without prejudice to a renewal of the application within thirty days after action by this court on a pending petition for rehearing. 298 U.S. 637, 56 S.Ct. 670, 80 L.Ed. 1371. On April 20, 1936, this court denied the petition for rehearing pending before it. 83 F. (2d) 450. On June 1, 1936, the Supreme Court denied the appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari. 298 U.S. 690, 56 S.Ct. 95…
Authorities Cited
- Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1929)
- Standard Oil Co. v. McLaughlin, 292 U.S. 605 (U.S. 1934)
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1934)
- Abrams v. Van Schaick, 293 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1934)
- Lansing Drop Forge Co. v. Am. State Sav. Bank, 297 U.S. 697 (U.S. 1936)
- Ex parte Gibbons, 297 U.S. 697 (U.S. 1936)