WEST BROTHERS BRICK CO.
v.
ALEXANDRIA
WEST BROTHERS BRICK CO.
ALEXANDRIA
302 U.S. 658
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Euclid v. Ambler Co., 272 U. S. 365, 387, 388; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325, 327, 328; Lewis v. Mayor, 290 U. S. 585.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)…v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599; O’Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co., 292 U. S. 609; Hammond Clock Co. v. Schiff, 293 U. S. 529; Bracken v. S. E. C., 299 U. S. 504; Leader v. Apex Hosiery Co., 302 U. S. 656; Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 302 U. S. 658; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526; S. E. C. v. Long Island Lighting Co., 325 U. S. 833; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States, 326 U. S. 690; Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Toledo, P…
-
Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. NEW York City, 438 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1978)…es the development in sensibilities and ideals reflected in landmark legislation like New York City’s. Cf. West Bros. Brick Co. v. Alexandria, 169 Va. 271, 282-283, 192 S. E. 881, 885-886, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 302 U. S. 658 (1937). There are some 53 designated landmarks and 5 historic districts or scenic landmarks in Manhattan between 14th and 59th Streets. See Landmarks Preservation Commission, Landmarks and Historic Districts (1977). It is, of course, true that the…
-
Yankee Network, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (Northern Corp., 107 F.2d 212 (D.C. Cir. 1939)…t if a statute confers a right upon a licensee to be protected against competition then he has a .right to complain, under the authority of Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co. v. Woodring, 67 App.D.C. 44, 89 F. 2d 788, rev’d on other grounds, 302 U.S. 658, 58 S.Ct. 365, 82 L.Ed. 509. The dissent in that case, upon which the Commission relies, maintained that the statute conferred no substantive “and therefore no adjective rights” upon the party affected because the statute imposed no duty upon the Se…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Vill. OF Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1926)
- Zahn v. Bd. OF Pub. Works, 274 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1927)
- Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 290 U.S. 585 (U.S. 1933)
- First Union Tr. & Sav. Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U.S. 585 (U.S. 1933)