HUGHES

v.

WISCONSIN TAX COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …the circumstances of production are irrelevant and that it is of no consequence whether the privileged documents were produced inadverently, unintentionally or under compulsion is squarely inconsistent with a finding of waiver. In Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 548 (1938), the Supreme Court made it very clear that a waiver “is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” 304 U.S. at 464. See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 525-26 (1972). Here the district court made no…
• Romero v. Squier, 133 F.2d 528 (9th Cir. 1943)
  …continuance. His associate counsel was present after Jhe maps were introduced and the single witness examined. As seen, the motion to exclude the maps offered was later made and has received our consideration. We do not agree that Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 548, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461, gives to any officer tried by a court-martial of his brother officers and defended by a brother officer of his choice, a constitutional right to have also a civilian associate lawyer for the portion of the trial in whi…

Authorities Cited

• Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1927)
• Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss., 286 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1932)
• NEW York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1937)
• Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1920)
• White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)
• J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin, 302 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1937)
• Morris v. Alabama, 302 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1937)